Home

  • Site Map

    All the web pages on the conference website

Program

Events

Locations

Information

Exhibition

Sponsorships

My Goldschmidt

Role functions

Abstract Details

(2020) Using Oxygen and Sulfur Isotopes to Partition Sources of Riverine Sulfate

Relph K, Stevenson E, Turchyn S, Antler G, Bickle M, Baronas J, Parsons D, Darby S & Tipper E

https://doi.org/10.46427/gold2020.2188

Sorry, the PDF cannot be displayed on your browser.

Download abstract

The author has not provided any additional details.

10f: Room 3, Friday 26th June 05:54 - 05:57

Listed below are questions that have been submitted by the community that the author will try and cover in their presentation. To submit a question, ensure you are signed in to the website. Authors or session conveners approve questions before they are displayed here.

Submitted by Joel Scheingross on Thursday 25th June 21:06
Hi Katy - Nice talk! If I understood correctly, the majority of the sulfate flux comes from the upper Mekong where (I presume) you have pyrite-rich rocks. Do you have a sense for how much your results (in terms of CO2 released from weathering of carbonate by sulfuric acid) would change if these pyrite-rich units were in the lower Mekong rather than the upper Mekong? Or, more generically, how does the spatial distribution of rock type influence CO2 release?


Sign in to ask a question.

Goldschmidt® is a registered trademark of the Geochemical Society and of the European Association of Geochemistry

Website managed and hosted by White Iron Conferences on behalf of the international geochemical community