Abstract Details
(2020) Petrographic and Geochemical Controls on δ34S of Pyrite and the Growth of the TAG Hydrothermal Mound, 26°N Mid Atlantic Ridge
Pujatti S, Klyukin Y, Steele-MacInnis M & Tutolo B
https://doi.org/10.46427/gold2020.2128
14e: Plenary Hall, Wednesday 24th June 00:51 - 00:54
Simone Pujatti
View all 2 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020
View abstracts at 2 conferences in series
Yury Klyukin View all 2 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 4 conferences in series
Matthew Steele-MacInnis View all 3 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020
Benjamin Tutolo View all 5 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 10 conferences in series
Yury Klyukin View all 2 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 4 conferences in series
Matthew Steele-MacInnis View all 3 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020
Benjamin Tutolo View all 5 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 10 conferences in series
Listed below are questions that have been submitted by the community that the author will try and cover in their presentation. To submit a question, ensure you are signed in to the website. Authors or session conveners approve questions before they are displayed here.
Submitted by Drew Syverson on Tuesday 23rd June 22:10
The model demonstrating d34S versus W/R ratio used equilibrium fractionation estimates between pyrite and H2S. Have you considered the "kinetic" fractionation associated with pyrite formation through the FeS mechanism, as suggested for MOR vent systems, or does the replacement of anhydrite to pyrite not produced such effect with regards to S isotope disequilibrium?
The model demonstrating d34S versus W/R ratio used equilibrium fractionation estimates between pyrite and H2S. Have you considered the "kinetic" fractionation associated with pyrite formation through the FeS mechanism, as suggested for MOR vent systems, or does the replacement of anhydrite to pyrite not produced such effect with regards to S isotope disequilibrium?
Sign in to ask a question.