Home

  • Site Map

    All the web pages on the conference website

Program

Events

Locations

Information

Exhibition

Sponsorships

My Goldschmidt

Role functions

Abstract Details

(2020) Microbial Mediation of Watershed Biogeochemical Cycles

Banfield J, Thomas A, Matheus Carnevali P, Lavy A, West-Roberts J, Crits-Christoph A, Hurst-Williams K & Hubbard S

https://doi.org/10.46427/gold2020.124

This presentation is the H.C. Urey Award 2020.

Sorry, the PDF cannot be displayed on your browser.

Download abstract

The author has not provided any additional details.

10f: Room 3, Friday 26th June 05:30 - 05:33

Listed below are questions that have been submitted by the community that the author will try and cover in their presentation. To submit a question, ensure you are signed in to the website. Authors or session conveners approve questions before they are displayed here.

Submitted by Pieter Bots on Wednesday 24th June 15:28
Thank you Jill, that's some really fascinating research!! I was wondering if you could elaborate a little bit on the geochemistry in the soils/sediments at the meandering bends you show around 7mins into the presentation. Specifically, I was intrigued to notice there being somewhat of an inverse relationship between inorganic and organic carbon. Do you have ideas on the reason for this? Many thanks again, Pieter Bots.


Submitted by Joel Scheingross on Thursday 25th June 20:09
Hi Jill - Congratulations on Urey Medal and thank you for the very interesting talk. I was intrigued by the large difference in community composition on hillslopes versus floodplains that you showed at the end of the talk. Do you have a sense how these differences influence the rate of biogeochemical cycling (I'm particularly interested in organic carbon oxidation)? Do you have any sense how representative your measurements at the East River are for temperate landscapes in general?


Submitted by Emily Burt on Thursday 25th June 21:50
This talk was very interesting! I was really interested in the prevalence of sulfur reducing and oxidizing bacteria in the floodplain at the East River. Do you have any thoughts on how we may begin to understand (or even quantify) the role of these redox processes in the watershed sulfate budget? I.e., do you think that a significant portion of the sulfate in the East River ends up getting reduced to secondary sulfides (or otherwise biogeochemically cycled) in the floodplain? Thank you!


Submitted by Marisa Repasch on Thursday 25th June 21:52
Hi Jill, thank you for preparing that very clear and data-rich presentation, and congratulations for the well-deserved Urey medal. My questions are along the same line as Joel's. Can the genome sequencing data be used to determine what parts of the landscape are carbon sinks/sources (i.e. where are the CO2-fixing microbes most active and where are CO2-producing organisms active)? For the meander bend areas, do you have enough data to correlate the spatial patterns in TN, TOC, and TIC with abundances of specific microbial communities?


Sign in to ask a question.

Goldschmidt® is a registered trademark of the Geochemical Society and of the European Association of Geochemistry

Website managed and hosted by White Iron Conferences on behalf of the international geochemical community