Home

  • Site Map

    All the web pages on the conference website

Program

Events

Locations

Information

Exhibition

Sponsorships

My Goldschmidt

Role functions

Abstract Details

(2020) Characterization Studies of Bentonite Barrier Interactions: Results from FEBEX-Dp Bentonite Samples

Jove Colon C, Payne C, Caporuscio F, Coker E & Knight A

https://doi.org/10.46427/gold2020.1227

The author has requested that this abstract is not discussed on social media.

Sorry, the PDF cannot be displayed on your browser.

Download abstract

08b: Room 3, Monday 22nd June 22:24 - 22:27

Listed below are questions that have been submitted by the community that the author will try and cover in their presentation. To submit a question, ensure you are signed in to the website. Authors or session conveners approve questions before they are displayed here.

Submitted by Laura Kennell-Morrison on Monday 22nd June 02:24
General question: Are there any considerations (or on-going heater tests already) at lower temperature (closer to what are the proposed thermal limits for a DGR in crystalline rock of approximately 100 degrees C)? As someone who is not in the EBS field, I would be curious to know how the swelling potential/capacity reduction at the interface would be impacted if exposed to much lower temperatures (presumably, the reduction in swelling capacity would be smaller, as the extent of drying and water loss within the bentonite clay at the interface would be lessened).
There is a heater test at the Honorobe site (Japan; clay rock) at 100C. I think their interest is to study the Kunigel V1 bentonite at temperatures lower than 100C. I'd also expect less of a temperature effect at T<100C in light of the FEBEX-DP work.

Sign in to ask a question.

Goldschmidt® is a registered trademark of the Geochemical Society and of the European Association of Geochemistry

Website managed and hosted by White Iron Conferences on behalf of the international geochemical community