Abstract Details
(2020) Differences between Bulk and in situ Cl Isotope Compositions of Lunar Materials
Gargano A, Sharp Z & Shearer C
https://doi.org/10.46427/gold2020.799
The author has requested that this abstract is not discussed on social media.
No presentation has been uploaded by the author.
The author has not provided any additional details.
01c: Plenary Hall, Thursday 25th June 06:06 - 06:09
Anthony Gargano
View abstracts at 2 conferences in series
Zachary Sharp View all 2 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020
Charles Shearer View all 3 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 12 conferences in series
Zachary Sharp View all 2 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020
Charles Shearer View all 3 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 12 conferences in series
Listed below are questions that have been submitted by the community that the author will try and cover in their presentation. To submit a question, ensure you are signed in to the website. Authors or session conveners approve questions before they are displayed here.
Submitted by My Riebe on Sunday 21st June 08:00
Could you expand a bit on the last sentence in the abstracts "If this relatively low d37Cl component is considered to more closely represent the Moon, then far less Cl loss is required to account for its isotopic composition."?
Could you expand a bit on the last sentence in the abstracts "If this relatively low d37Cl component is considered to more closely represent the Moon, then far less Cl loss is required to account for its isotopic composition."?
Sign in to ask a question.