Home

  • Site Map

    All the web pages on the conference website

Program

Events

Locations

Information

Exhibition

Sponsorships

My Goldschmidt

Role functions

Abstract Details

(2020) Re-evaluation of B and 11B Budgets in the Ocean Based on Mud Volcanoes on Land and Offshore

You CF

https://doi.org/10.46427/gold2020.3041

The author has requested that this abstract is not discussed on social media.

Sorry, the PDF cannot be displayed on your browser.

Download abstract

The author has not provided any additional details.

10f: Plenary Hall, Thursday 25th June 23:30 - 23:33

Listed below are questions that have been submitted by the community that the author will try and cover in their presentation. To submit a question, ensure you are signed in to the website. Authors or session conveners approve questions before they are displayed here.

Submitted by Marisa Repasch on Thursday 25th June 17:13
Thanks for sharing this interesting data on Boron in mud volcanoes. I have several questions: 1) Why is there more lattice-bound B in the Kerch peninsula MVs than in Taiwan? Are the fluids from different depths? 2) What are the respective roles of lattice-bound vs. exchangeable B for the ocean boron budget? Is lattice-bound boron removed from ocean water, or is it eventually released via weathering at the sea floor? Can you quantify the relative amounts of exchangebale vs. lattice-bound with the isotope data? Thanks!


Sign in to ask a question.

Goldschmidt® is a registered trademark of the Geochemical Society and of the European Association of Geochemistry

Website managed and hosted by White Iron Conferences on behalf of the international geochemical community